« lPod | Main | Advertizing By Trackbacks? »
I am not a dork. I was kidding, that was a test. I knew it would work. Danny was the only one who noticed it was not an i it was a lowercase L! Muahahahaha! So sorry Uncle Ted, we can not be dorks together (you got Nicole for that). This is for you dad: I am sorry everybody, because I "lied".
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 7, 2005 8:46 PM.
The previous post in this blog was lPod.
The next post in this blog is Advertizing By Trackbacks?.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (13)
yes... perhaps kelly is not a dork, but she definitely IS a nerd!!!
Posted by Nicole | February 7, 2005 8:57 PM
Posted on February 7, 2005 20:57
Hmmmm . . . Well, that must mean that Eric didn't get one either, because he got an IPod, when it is actually supposed to be iPod.
Nicole can't be a dork, she hasn't even made any of her own accesories for her iPod.
Posted by UT | February 7, 2005 10:38 PM
Posted on February 7, 2005 22:38
I didn't know that you spelled Muhahahaha like that. I'm using that one later!
Posted by sista | February 8, 2005 1:11 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 13:11
I would have to say I am, indeed a dork. Making and ipod case out of ductape? yeah, definitly.
Posted by Eric | February 8, 2005 5:20 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 17:20
I have to go with you on that eric. And nicole...
definitions:
NERD:
1. A foolish, inept, or unattractive person.
2.A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept.
DORK:
1. a dull stupid fatuous person
2. p*nis
I do not think that anybody here is a dork... Maybe a nerd though.
Posted by kelly | February 8, 2005 5:33 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 17:33
what is this post even about?
I would define myself as a:
weird??o (w??rd)
n. Slang pl. weird??oes
1.person regarded as being very strange or eccentric.
2. deranged, potentially dangerous person.
probably the second one
Posted by Eric | February 8, 2005 6:52 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 18:52
WOAH WOAH!!!!
YOU DIDN'T get an ipod???? that was bad. im officaly mad at you.
Posted by Eric | February 8, 2005 6:55 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 18:55
i really didnt understand what was going on, you should have given a better explanation. man... im not really mad at you, but... man...
Posted by Eric | February 8, 2005 6:59 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 18:59
you see, it was a test. I always get confused with the font san serif. the lower case L: l. The upper case i: I. They are EXACTLY the same. Something that I noticed it that when eric wrote about and iPod, a lot of people looked at. iPod is spelled with an i (lowercase, but I though that some people may think that I just made the same mistake a eric). Sure enough, my theory was proved correct, my dad always looks, but Uncle Ted and Eric looked at it and posted, thinking it was iPod rather than LPod. I wanted to try something like this for a while, and here was the opportunity. That comes to show that San Serif is a very confusing font and should not be put on computer programming because there are a lot of good fonts to choose from. Some of them even look exactly like San Serif without the confusing lettering. Either it should be taken off a computer or not be used. And that concludes my very well thought out comment. Thank you.
Posted by kelly | February 8, 2005 7:12 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 19:12
That was my better explanation eric.
Posted by kelly | February 8, 2005 7:13 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 19:13
l THlNK Y0U SH0ULD JUST ACCEPT THAT S0ME LETTERS L00K ALlKE. O'S L00K LlKE ZER0ES. ARE Y0U G0lNG T0 BAN TH0SE?
Posted by UT | February 8, 2005 9:34 PM
Posted on February 8, 2005 21:34
I could tell Ted was using zeros because they were much skinnier. A friend of mine has a terrible san-serif name: illene. It looks like three lower-case "L"s in a row: Illene.
Kelly is considering changing the font style of her Blog to Georgia, a seriffed font. Her "el-Pod" post will look strange and future generations may wonder how we were all so easily fooled by it.
Posted by Jeb | February 9, 2005 12:14 AM
Posted on February 9, 2005 00:14
That is not the same, I could tell too Uncle Ted, that isn't the same thing. On computers, you can definitely tell the difference between 0 and O.
Posted by kelly | February 9, 2005 3:09 PM
Posted on February 9, 2005 15:09